Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 March 2010 08:28, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So please - start reporting again - I hope I explained what does "UPSTREAM"
resolution mean. I can't promise you, we (Fedora, KDE SIG, KDE upstream or
whoever) fix the bug but...

I had a bug some time ago in Okular that I reported and was told to report upstream. Did that and upstream said "That not us, that's in some other bit; report it there". Should I have gone back to Fedora to report against this other bit or find the upstream for that? What I did was download Adobe Reader instead (not sure when it changed but Okular seems to work again now). When I was recently told to report another bug upstream, I couldn't be bothered being fobbed off again since it came across as futile the time before (the fact that upstream closed as upstream meant the bug seemed to drop off the radar).

--
Dick
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux