On Wednesday 31 March 2010 04:26:12 Linuxguy123 wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:09 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle > > bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file > > an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If > > the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX. > > But > > if the bug has been reported upstream, the Fedora bug gets closed > > UPSTREAM. Ether way, the bug gets closed, no matter if it was actually > > fixed or not. > > +1 on this ! I thought it was just me. I've given up on reporting bugs > largely because of this issue. So please - start reporting again - I hope I explained what does "UPSTREAM" resolution mean. I can't promise you, we (Fedora, KDE SIG, KDE upstream or whoever) fix the bug but... Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
