Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:09 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle
> bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file
> an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If
> the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX.
> But
> if the bug has been reported upstream, the Fedora bug gets closed
> UPSTREAM. Ether way, the bug gets closed, no matter if it was actually
> fixed or not. 

+1 on this !  I thought it was just me.  I've given up on reporting bugs
largely because of this issue.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux