Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2010 13:09:46 Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle
> > bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file
> > an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If
> > the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX. But
> > if the bug has been reported upstream, the Fedora bug gets closed
> > UPSTREAM. Ether way, the bug gets closed, no matter if it was actually
> > fixed or not.
> 
> <Citation from Bugzilla help>
>  UPSTREAM

That page is not the appropriate reference for Fedora, as it actually
says at the top. The canonical Fedora reference is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow .
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux