Re: Update testing policy: how to use Bodhi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 03:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> So I don't think blocking an update outright for having received type 2 
> feedback is sane at all.

Sigh. That was why I said not to sidetrack the discussion because it was
the least important bit of the post. It was just an example of how
easily the policy can be adapted. I'm really not interested in thrashing
out the tiny details of *that* in *this* thread, that is not what it's
for. I had a whole paragraph about the possibility of an override
mechanism for maintainers which I left out precisely in order to avoid
this kind of discussion, but apparently that wasn't enough...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux