On 27/03/10 04:12, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 03:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> So I don't think blocking an update outright for having received type 2 >> feedback is sane at all. > > Sigh. That was why I said not to sidetrack the discussion because it was > the least important bit of the post. It was just an example of how > easily the policy can be adapted. I'm really not interested in thrashing > out the tiny details of *that* in *this* thread, that is not what it's > for. I had a whole paragraph about the possibility of an override > mechanism for maintainers which I left out precisely in order to avoid > this kind of discussion, but apparently that wasn't enough... I'm not sure if your usage policy covers changes to Bodhi, but how about the system emailing the upstream developers (direct and/or email lists) when a release is made available for testing/release and also on any problems found ? Terry -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
