On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 00:35 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 00:31, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 00:11 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > >> This is basically what Doug had proposed, except that you added 5. and 6. > > > > Great, glad to hear we're thinking in the same direction from different > > angles :) Do you have a link to his proposal? I don't recall reading it. > > Here it is: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-March/131799.html Oh, yeah, that one. I even replied to it, but it obviously fell prey to my mind-erase of the whole mess of a thread =) in that case, yep, my proposal is more or less just a slight elaboration on Doug's indeed. I may even have subconsciously brought in some elements from Doug's when writing it, so thanks Doug! if you're working in this direction in improving Bodhi, then, from the 'update testing policy' angle, I think I'll just leave it at 'wait and see' for the new Bodhi version. Do you have a vague ETA on when we can expect the improved Bodhi? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
