On 3/14/2010 8:14 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Peter Hutterer wrote: > > >> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:14:48PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> On Sat, March 13, 2010 4:58 pm, Peter Hutterer wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't there a mere RISK to lose 70-80% of our users if we do _not_ >>>> implement >>>> the changes as well? Especially given the chance that the poll did not >>>> represent a significant user sample? >>>> >>> How many users do we need? >>> >> sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question. Which user number are you >> referring to? >> > I'd venture he meant in response to your "the poll did not represent a > significant user sample" comment. So, how many users are needed to make it > representative? > No, I meant how many users does Fedora need to be a viable distribution? Could we loose 70-80% (seems far fetched) of our user base and still be viable? If we can, I don't really care how many users we loose as long as Fedora becomes more useful to me. What concerns me most is retaining a large percentage of committed maintainers and community members, and that is a small enough number that I think we can poll effectively. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
