Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Thomas Janssen
<thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 16:05 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd expect people that want 100% Free to use gNewSense. I'm not sure how
>>> you define "more ammeniable to new contributors", so that's harder to
>>> address. Still, I think it's clear that at least some people use Fedora
>>> *because* it is leading (yes, almost bleeding) edge.
>>>
>>> And this is going to kill that. (Or will if it gets enforced.)
>>
>> Fedora can still be (b)leading edge in the technologies it picks up for
>> its releases.  At the same time it can retain stability after the
>> release has been released.  Every 6 months, a new bleeding edge release
>> picking up all the kinds of things Fedora is the first to integrate.
>>
>> Stop trying to drag rawhide into our releases.
>
> Could you explain to me, what makes Fedora exactly more leading edge
> if we use a X-server beta that would fit better into rawhide then in a
> release

Wasn't ready with wording and clicked 'send' instead of 'discard' sorry.

-- 
LG Thomas

Dubium sapientiae initium
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux