On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:00 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Except for a few people's proposals (dledford, adamw, jreznik, lmacken, > dmalcolm) most of the proposals are weighting one of these viewpoints over > the other which is not a very good way to build a community. > Actually I think it's a fine way to build a community. A community of like minded individuals who want to produce something for an intended audience, and a community of like minded consumers who wish to consume that which you are building. Instead what we have now is fiefdoms of different strategies for producing updates and consumers who are getting mixed results from different parts of the operating system. Nobody is getting what they really want, either every package reasonably updated everywhere all the time, nor a conservative stable and bugfix only update approach. So nobody is truly happy, which I think is the real terrible way to build a community. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
