On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I think you're hitting the nail on the head with this question. However, > I'm afraid that the answer depends on the class of user. Some users want to > have their old bugs fixed ASAP and are willing to tolerate some regressions > as long as those regressions are in turn fixed. Other users are willing to > work around a known bug as long as they don't have to learn about new bugs > when an update comes along. > > Except for a few people's proposals (dledford, adamw, jreznik, lmacken, > dmalcolm) most of the proposals are weighting one of these viewpoints over > the other which is not a very good way to build a community. I think it is a fine way to BUILD a community - but it's building a community that matches a certain demographic. It's like marketing features, if your features can be handled for a particular demographic then that's the community you build. I think what you're saying is "it's not a very good way to build a community of EVERYONE" but it is not obvious to me that: 1. we want everyone 2. we can come up with a way to target everyone. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
