Jesse Keating wrote:
> I had thought about these things, but they didn't strike me as a high
> level update type. And for the leaf node packages, when they do break
> it's not as less disruptive as you might think. Leaf node packages
> exist for a reason, they are likely very important to somebody, and if
> that breaks, that's going to be a very big issue for that somebody.
But if they're outdated, that can also be a big issue. Some leaf packages
are under heavy development, so users don't want to run old versions, nor do
upstream developers want them to.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
