-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/2010 11:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Alexander Kahl wrote: >> Please define "massive" if you're keeping exactly what's needed to keep >> everything running and prune anything else by using a sophisticated, >> tunable garbage collection mechanism. > > The whole point of the exercise was to do a lot of updates. But the more > updates we do, the more disk space the old versions you're keeping around > are going to eat up. Again, this is where garbage collection kicks in. For any kind of rollback system save from "guessing" the old state you'll need some kind of recording. Nix' mechanism eats much fewer resources than e.g. complete filesystem snapshots. >>> and also not compliant with the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard). >> Yep. It's much better, comparable to the GAC (global assembly cache) of >> the CLR (Mono), > > Yuck! Do you seriously call that "better"? Do you actually know the GAC, i.e. have you ever worked with it? > Anyway, the FHS is not really negotiable. Luckily the whole LSB is negotiable, else we'd still be sticking to this horrible, ancient SysV init system. - -- Alexander Kahl GNU/Linux Software Developer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuaFE0ACgkQVTRddCFHw12VdwCgn558Jy9kMsc00dAiw6eEwvgR N10An2joJ2y0u3cKLPjeQDx/pUjZl0vm =pWur -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
