Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/11/2010 11:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> If a user has built an application against a library, it's not
>>> especially reasonable to then break that application by bumping a soname
>>> in a stable release.
>>
>> If the application is in Fedora as all applications eventually ought to be, 
>> we will take care of rebuilding it. Otherwise, whoever built it (some third-
>> party repository or the user him/herself) is responsible for rebuilding it. 
>> This has always worked fine, I don't see the problem.
> 
> What about somebody developing on their own computer?  Having to rebuild
> because you (or possibly somebody else, if a system has a dedicated
> admin) loaded an update is highly irritating.

It's a disaster if you're relying on a third-party compiled program
for your Internet connectivity.  Imagine it: one morning you update,
then the connection breaks, then you can't get to the Internet to find
out how to get things working again.

Andrew.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux