Alexander Kahl wrote:
> Please define "massive" if you're keeping exactly what's needed to keep
> everything running and prune anything else by using a sophisticated,
> tunable garbage collection mechanism.
The whole point of the exercise was to do a lot of updates. But the more
updates we do, the more disk space the old versions you're keeping around
are going to eat up.
>> and also not compliant with the FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard).
> Yep. It's much better, comparable to the GAC (global assembly cache) of
> the CLR (Mono),
Yuck! Do you seriously call that "better"?
Anyway, the FHS is not really negotiable.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
