Re: CLA problems (was: Re: Install fedora-easy-karma by default?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:20:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 03/11/2010 02:14 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you leave bodhi feedback with an FAS account if you haven't signed a
> > > CLA? (The thing about FAS accounts I am not crazy about is the CLA. What
> > > about using a bugzilla account instead?)
> > >
> >
> > What is the problem you have with the CLA?
>
> Imho it is to complex, which scares potential contributor away.
> Especially if only a comment and a karma value are required, the CLA is
> way to complex to require it.
>

We don't require it though I thought?  Can somone who has not signed the
CLA confirm?

	-Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux