Re: Install fedora-easy-karma by default? (was: Re: Expect more positive bodhi karma / check karma automatism)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said:
>> > Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it
>> > by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to
>> > provide feedback.
>>
>> I do not mind, if it is installed by default, but I am not sure,
>> whether this is a good idea. Users will still need a FAS account,
>> install packages from updates-testing and know that it exist to use it.
>
> Given that it at the moment requires a FAS account, perhaps having
> it as default in the Fedora packager group is a good first step.
>
> Hey, why don't we register for FAS accounts with firstboot?

Good idea. We could also register FAS accounts within the Fedora-Tour
once it's ready. I think it would be a good place with lots of space
to explain the user what benefits a FAS account has.

-- 
LG Thomas

Dubium sapientiae initium
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux