Bill Nottingham wrote: > Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said: >>> Also thanks for packaging that immediately -- what about installing it >>> by default? It's a tiny package and we really do want our users to >>> provide feedback. >> >> I do not mind, if it is installed by default, but I am not sure, >> whether this is a good idea. Users will still need a FAS account, >> install packages from updates-testing and know that it exist to use it. > > Given that it at the moment requires a FAS account, perhaps having > it as default in the Fedora packager group is a good first step. > > Hey, why don't we register for FAS accounts with firstboot? Can you leave bodhi feedback with an FAS account if you haven't signed a CLA? (The thing about FAS accounts I am not crazy about is the CLA. What about using a bugzilla account instead?) -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- . . . . . ##@NO CARRIER -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
