On 09/03/10 23:07, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram<metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other >>> (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? >>> >>> Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra. >> >> Some contributors interested in Zarafa are now maintaining it in the >> Fedora repository. If anyone is interested in packaging and maintaining >> any of the alternatives you mention, Fedora will gladly include them as >> long as they are free and open source software. >> >> Rahul >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > > Zarafa is a good alternative to MS exchange, lightweight (written in > PHP) and Zarafa webmail is looks like outlook (i dislike this). Do you know if a chat client is planned for Zafara a la google chat (jabber ajax style)? I couldn't find one. > if someone is interested in packaging of Zimbra Open Source Edition > (ZCS) then i'm ready to collaborate (i'm good in packaging but i don't > have any real experience especially in JEE stuffs ) Does Zimbra still ship as a blob of specific versions of lots of open source software, of which the specific versions cannot be changed? > also ZCS for RHEL/Fedora is distributed as RPMs > > Best regards. > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
