On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: >> All, >> >> I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other >> (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? >> >> Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra. > > Some contributors interested in Zarafa are now maintaining it in the > Fedora repository. If anyone is interested in packaging and maintaining > any of the alternatives you mention, Fedora will gladly include them as > long as they are free and open source software. > > Rahul > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Zarafa is a good alternative to MS exchange, lightweight (written in PHP) and Zarafa webmail is looks like outlook (i dislike this). if someone is interested in packaging of Zimbra Open Source Edition (ZCS) then i'm ready to collaborate (i'm good in packaging but i don't have any real experience especially in JEE stuffs ) also ZCS for RHEL/Fedora is distributed as RPMs Best regards. -- Athmane Madjoudj -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
