On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 14:01 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > > > > > I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path > > > policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still > > > allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable. > > > > That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the > > critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc. > > but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. > > Right, the critical path package list does contain the GNOME stack, cups-libs, > etc. > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100309/logs/critpath.txt So then great. I thought a lot of that was on there already, but didn't have the link handy (bookmarked). Well then, to me, at least having a very high bar on those would probably be sufficient for now at least. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
