On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > > > I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path > > policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still > > allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable. > > That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the > critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc. > but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. I don't > personally care if KDE is updated 20 times a week, or about other > packages that aren't installed by default being rebased often. The current critical path does include most of that. You can see the current critpath list at: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100309/logs/critpath.txt It's generated daily, it's not a static list. It does currently include most of the important bits of GNOME, and cups-libs. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
