On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:10:04PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > 2) Updates that constitute a part of the 'important' package set (defined > below) must follow the rules as defined for critical path packages for > pending releases, meaning that they require positive karma from releng > and/or QA before they go stable. This also includes security updates for > these packages. > > The 'important' package set is defined as the following: > - The current critical path package set > - All major desktop environments' core functionality (GNOME, KDE, XFCE, > LXDE) > - Package updating frameworks (gnome-packagekit, kpackagekit) > - Major desktop productivity apps. An initial list would be firefox, > kdebase (konqueror), thunderbird, evolution, kdepim (kmail). How about every package that's installed by default in the primary spins? > Comments, questions, reasoned arguments? Part of me wonders if this should be > expanded with a sliding scale for update types (enhancements, for example, get > more stringent treatment than bugfix/security). This seems pretty sane. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
