On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:02:07 Seth Vidal wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >>> Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change >>> update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are >>> our user and what they want. Now someone wants to know who are our >>> users/what our users really want, we don't want to know it, because we >>> don't want to do Fedora for what users want or need, because we're >>> developing Fedora for us. Funny ;-) >> >> Actually, I want to make the update policies so that we have fewer BROKEN >> things. > > With same logic you can say less updates - fewer broken things (regressions, > yes) or less updates - more broken things (fixes, features)... Especially with > current style of Fedora development model and FESCo allowing unfinished > features entering final release... > I'm sure with the same logic I can say a lot of things. What I said was " I want fewer broken things." -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
