On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:02:07 Seth Vidal wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change > > update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are > > our user and what they want. Now someone wants to know who are our > > users/what our users really want, we don't want to know it, because we > > don't want to do Fedora for what users want or need, because we're > > developing Fedora for us. Funny ;-) > > Actually, I want to make the update policies so that we have fewer BROKEN > things. With same logic you can say less updates - fewer broken things (regressions, yes) or less updates - more broken things (fixes, features)... Especially with current style of Fedora development model and FESCo allowing unfinished features entering final release... Jaroslav > -sv -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
