-1. Nay. NoWay. No thanks. Uh uh. I could find little or nothing in your proposal to which I agreed... so decided not to quote any. I just registered at Fedoraforums.org and voted "adventurous" in Adam's poll. Just to make sure my voice is heard, and not the shouting of folks who think they know what I want, and want to limit my choices for my own good. I'm using Fedora, which means I want to run leading edge (or at worst current) software. I do software development, and want to have access to the latest and greatest without running Rawhide. I've been a Fedora user since FC3. I have no interest in using RHEL on my systems. You appear to want to turn Fedora into a RHEL clone. Centos does that well enough already. If you don't want to update your own packages except in rawhide or the development release at alpha level, that is your choice. Please do not inhibit my choices by trying to outlaw the very thing that makes Fedora vital for me as an end user. By the way, you made a trivial error when you created the Subject line. Since stuff like that happens with packages, I'd like packagers to have the ability to correct problems. Similarly, if a package is under active development I appreciate the ability to receive enhancements in the service stream for supported releases. Either fixes or enhancements should be reasonably well tested, and well documented (including update comments). Radically incompatible fixes/enhancements that inconvenience users and break running systems are indeed problematic... why yes, I do run bind on my Fedora servers. Al -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
