2010/3/7 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/3/7 Thomas Janssen <thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> 2010/3/7 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> 2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> The numbers 11, 12 should only indicate the core >>>> components revision number . >>> >>> I'm not convinced to this philosophy. I have used a few Linux distros >>> in past 11 years, and this is something new to me... >>> >>> I hope that RHEL 6 will be released soon, Fedora 11 is going to be too >>> bleeding edge for me ;) That is you compare a few Linux distros with Fedora and "this" is something new to you. It's not for Fedora users. So the question is still alive: Why are you trying to change the Face and Character of Fedora instead of using what fits your needs (your own mentioned RHEL/CentOS)? >> Well, sorry, but you clearly state that Fedora is something new to you >> and you don't like the philosophy. > > No, I clearly state, that this "new way" described by Orcan is > something new to me (and I not really convinced to this). See above, and there is no new way yet. But people trying to make a copy of Ubuntu or openSUSE out of Fedora. >> So why don't you use something that >> fits your needs like CentOS 5 as you mentioned RHEL 6 but rather try >> to make something out of Fedora that Fedora isn't? Or become familiar >> with what Fedora is and stands for. > > The same version numbers for stable version and previous stable > version is not a Fedora way that I know. I used Fedora since FC5 and I > wasn't aware about such plans. Since you haven't noticed it in all that time, it looks like it can't be that bad ;) -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
