2010/3/7 Thomas Janssen <thomasj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/3/7 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: >> 2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> The numbers 11, 12 should only indicate the core >>> components revision number . >> >> I'm not convinced to this philosophy. I have used a few Linux distros >> in past 11 years, and this is something new to me... >> >> I hope that RHEL 6 will be released soon, Fedora 11 is going to be too >> bleeding edge for me ;) > > Well, sorry, but you clearly state that Fedora is something new to you > and you don't like the philosophy. No, I clearly state, that this "new way" described by Orcan is something new to me (and I not really convinced to this). RH6 was my first distro and I'm using mostly RedHat things since then. > So why don't you use something that > fits your needs like CentOS 5 as you mentioned RHEL 6 but rather try > to make something out of Fedora that Fedora isn't? Or become familiar > with what Fedora is and stands for. The same version numbers for stable version and previous stable version is not a Fedora way that I know. I used Fedora since FC5 and I wasn't aware about such plans. > > Would be the same as if i try to change another Distro just because > their philosophy is new to me and i don't like it. > > Maybe you can explain? > > -- > LG Thomas > > Dubium sapientiae initium > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel