On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 19:17 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > >> For all those who're claiming users don't want upgrades like KDE 4.4.0: > >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-February/367266.html > >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/2010-March/006102.html > >> > > > > Now, lets see you take the leap in logic from those two emails, to the > > majority of your users without any further research. > > 1. Why shouldn't the burden of proof be on the side which wants to change > the status quo? > 2. These users are our niche, the others are better served by other > distributions. Numbers shouldn't matter. I think blindly charging for > popularity is going to kill us. The vast majority of computer users uses > Window$ anyway. :-( > > Kevin Kofler > What makes your status quo more or less correct that other's status quo? Not every maintainer pushes the way you think they do. There /is/ no status quo out side of "chaos". -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
