Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said: > 1. Why shouldn't the burden of proof be on the side which wants to change > the status quo? You seem to be ignoring the fact that there are multiple status quos in Fedora. There is "more stable" (GNOME, Firefox for example) vs. "more rolling" (KDE). I personally think it would be better to have a single (published) status quo across the distribution, so users know what to expect, no matter which desktop, browser, office suite, etc. they choose. > 2. These users are our niche, the others are better served by other > distributions. Numbers shouldn't matter. I think blindly charging for > popularity is going to kill us. If numbers shouldn't matter, and charging for popularity is bad, why do we need to target your "semi-rolling update" mode? -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
