On 4 March 2010 19:59, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think we > really need to be more conservative about what version of our default > updating tool we include in our releases (and in fact pushing PackageKit 0.6 > as a post-release enhancement update once the issues with it are resolved > and there is an actual kpackagekit release to go with it, while shipping F13 > GA with 0.5, would probably have been much less disruptive). PackageKit, as in the daemon has been pretty stable for ages. PackageKit-glib2 has been stable up until recently, where we broke API to fix a bug in a little-used piece of API (most applications, including GPK, unaffected). PackageKit-qt has had wild changes, which the QT and KDE guys said they needed to fix bugs in KPackageKit. KPackageKit has a much smaller community base than GNOME PackageKit (which is expected, it's a younger project) and so the developers only have the resources and desire to work on git master, rather than stable branches. If you want to talk to anybody about stability, it's probably the PackageKit-qt guys you need to talk to, and offer help. I'm pretty sure the situation will get better over time, as the -qt library settles down and the kpackagekit project gains momentum. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
