On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:46:35 -0800 Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The problem is that there are a ton more devices that need modeswitching > > > than just Huawei, and upstream USB developers are refusing to take > > > patches that add more devices to the kernel modeswitching code because > > > they assert it should be done in userspace. [] > > Who are these mysterious kernel developers? You don't happen to have > > any e-mail saved? > > I'm one of those developers. We've hashed this out before. > I'm pretty sure Greg's with me on this one. If the device can be handled > in userspace, then it should be. If it's storage emulation mode is not > good enough to handle in userspace, then a kernel update will have to be > done. OK, that sounds good. So, I withdraw objections after Rahul's question, as far as Fedora is concerned. On the kernel side, should we discard all the cruft un unusual_devs.h? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
