On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 13:07 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > The problem is that there are a ton more devices that need modeswitching > > than just Huawei, and upstream USB developers are refusing to take > > patches that add more devices to the kernel modeswitching code because > > they assert it should be done in userspace. Thus, usb_modeswitch is the > > only thing that can handle *all* modems that need modeswitching these > > days. Honestly we should just stop adding new Huawei IDs to > > unusual_devs, and just use usb_modeswitch. > > Who are these mysterious kernel developers? You don't happen to have > any e-mail saved? > In fact, the party line was exactly > the opposite: eradicate usb_modeswitch. if you're going to ask Dan for names and saved emails, presumably you should provide the same :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
