On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:44:55PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 03/03/2010 04:40 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On 03/03/2010 04:30 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> So while I agree that some of the posts where people are simply > >> attacking other people need to stop, I can't agree that this thread has > >> reached a stage where it is advisable to stop constructive discussions. > >> I would argue that it's necessary to continue constructive discussions > >> in order to reach the stage where a wiki page and proposals makes sense. > > > > I would say that the next steps should be one (or more) of the following: > > > > * A proposal to adopt a more stable update cycle > > * A proposal to adopt a more semi-rolling update style > > * A hybrid proposal which deals with both cases > > > > If you would like to write a proposal on those items (or any other > > improvement related to updates management) and then start a new thread > > focused on constructive discussion and honing of said proposal, I would > > have no quarrel with it. > > Well, I *did* make a barebones proposal towards the third option in the > thread in question, and I intended to work some more on it (in a > constructive manner). But, I can put it in a new thread if you like. > > Note, you might find this useful in that: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Lifecycle(draft) Attempt to define goals (semi-rolling vs "QA'd" [The more stable style]) as well as the various pieces that we can affect to implement those goals and: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Lifecycle_Proposals Several people have made proposals which are listed here. I know of several others (for instance, jresnik's proposal for different F-Current and F-Current-1 update styles) and your own. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp6H1bc9jInE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
