On 03/03/2010 02:27 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Okay. This has gone on long enough. The signal is gone from the
> following threads:
The signal is not entirely gone, although it is getting weaker.
> * FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call forfeedback)
> * Worthless updates
> * Refining the update queues/process
>
> Accordingly, I'm marking those threads as Hall-Monitored. Please stop
> posting in them. If you have a concrete suggestion on how to improve
> Fedora updates, please write it in a wiki page, open a FESCo trac
> ticket, and they will consider it.
The problem is that having a concrete suggestion of how to improve
fedora updates requires knowing whether we want a more stable update
cycle or a more semi-rolling update style. It would be easy for us to
carte blanch hand down an edict on this, but that would also be wrong.
This is a community driven distribution, and by my count the number of
people that stood up in favor of semi-rolling updates was not that
different from the number of people that stood up for stable updates (I
have something like 4 for semi-rolling and 6 for stable, but many people
didn't make their preferences perfectly clear, and this count is from my
admittedly worthless memory of those that were explicit in their desires).
So while I agree that some of the posts where people are simply
attacking other people need to stop, I can't agree that this thread has
reached a stage where it is advisable to stop constructive discussions.
I would argue that it's necessary to continue constructive discussions
in order to reach the stage where a wiki page and proposals makes sense.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
