On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 20:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Jones wrote: > > > On 03/03/2010 01:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Mathieu Bridon wrote: > >>> In the end, I think the question is not about giving users what users > >>> want (be it frequent updates or stalled releases), but giving users > >>> what we see as a better deal for them. > >> > >> I think wanting to decide for your users is a really arrogant attitude. > > > > But that's exactly what you do with rebases during a stable release. > > It's the user's choice to use a progressive distribution such as Fedora > rather than a semi-conservative one like Ubuntu or a conservative one like > RHEL/CentOS or Debian stable. "choosing a sane update policy for users" == bad! Users should be allowed to choose! "choosing to dump almost anything you want into stable" == good! Users can always go use another distro. if they don't agree with me! /me wondering why I'm even reading this thread anymore -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
