On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:25 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > We should make a stand and drop it from Fedora until it's not made up of > > > bonghits and failure. (haha, yeah. thanks, here all week, etc) > > > > I'm not quite sure why it needs separate lsb/upstart init scripts > > anyway. Don't most of our packages just include one initscript with both > > bits in the headers? > > No. A package could have either a SystemV init script or an upstart job > file. (Note that we don't recommend people push upstart job files for their > services yet, but since when have people listened...) oh, yeah, that's right. we have SysV scripts with the LSB stuff in the headers. no need to depend on redhat-lsb for that, though, so far as I can figure? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
