On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:14 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:51:17AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:37 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > --> Processing Dependency: tor-lsb = 0.2.1.23-1200.fc12 for package: > > > tor-0.2.1.23-1200.fc12.i686 > > > > This is where things go to hell. Why in the hell is tor-lsb /required/ > > by tor? LSB isn't really good for anything except landing a bunch of > > crap on your system that you don't really want there. Making it > > required is rather... lame. > > Why do we even bother supporting bullshit standards like LSB ? > > We should make a stand and drop it from Fedora until it's not made up of > bonghits and failure. (haha, yeah. thanks, here all week, etc) I'm not quite sure why it needs separate lsb/upstart init scripts anyway. Don't most of our packages just include one initscript with both bits in the headers? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
