Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2010 04:23 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> * Has ABI/API change (and is a Critical Path package)
> 
> Wrong criterion, sorry. "Has ABI/API change and fails to include rebuilds of 
> the affected packages" should be the criterion, critical path or not is 
> irrelevant. But this is basically covered by "causes broken deps" already.

"It means we have to update even more software" seems like a reason /not/ to
ship an update that isn't a bugfix or security fix. Not a reason it *should*
be done.

-- 
        Peter

I hope you know that this will go down on your permanent record.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux