On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 00:58 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > 1. upgrades which disrupt, regress or break things. Those can only be pushed > to Rawhide, if at all. (Sometimes it might be better to not push a change > even to Rawhide.) > 2. upgrades which do none of the above. Those are what adds value to stable > releases and pushing those is a good thing. It provides value which no other > major distribution is providing, at least not those with numbered releases. And without using some sort of repository for users to test things and provide feedback, how do you propose we distinguish between the two sets of updates there? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
