On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Will Woods wrote: > >> * Has ABI/API change (and is a Critical Path package) > > This should be handled by the current rpmguard test: > https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/wiki/rpmguard > > since changing the ABI/API should generally change the soname/version, > thus changing the package Provides. Furthermore there's plans to > actually diff the symbol tables themselves, for extra safety: > https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/75 tricky with accidental ABI/API breakage - like in the yum api, for example. > So I think it would be shortsighted for FESCo to refuse to even discuss > a policy about what manual testing is currently required, since any plan > for improving the quality of the distribution will always require some > amount of manual testing. agreed. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
