On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:30:18PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Will Woods wrote: > > So I think it would be shortsighted for FESCo to refuse to even discuss > > a policy about what manual testing is currently required, since any plan > > for improving the quality of the distribution will always require some > > amount of manual testing. > > agreed. What kind of tests need to be done always manually? The only ones I can think are tests for the appearance of applications or tests that require specific hardware. But in the general case, I do not think that for every package manual testing will always be required, except while creating new automatic tests. E.g. if you have a library package with good unit test and behaviour test coverage and tests for RPM metadata, what do you want to test manually? Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpDYHAFimC1O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
