"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Clearly, bohdi/bugzilla/pk interaction is not good enough to collect > the kind of feedback needed for the karma system to work. And bohdi > should get smarter about identifying packages that need this > feedback. Critical path is a good first approximation but what would > really help is some heuristic about how much breakage a bad package > can cause : how many other packages depend on it (dependency > metrics), how long is has lived (has it been in Fedora for years of > imported the week before), was it even in the default install for > some people, etc. [...] +1. Extra tooling should help here. Consider also the possibility of adding in download statistics into the 'slow-down-cowboy' heuristics: use records that particular update-testing RPMs have been downloaded as evidence that they are OK. - FChE -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
