On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 11:43 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > There are things only packagers can fix. Everything else should be > handled by tools so packagers can focus on the parts where they add real > value. If a process change puts more burden on all packagers because > it's easier to ask packagers to do stuff than fix tools, it's a bad > process change. And yes I accept than in some cases not burdening > packagers means increasing the chance for some problems. Perfection is > the ennemy of good. This is a wonderful sentiment. How does it apply to the current situation, exactly? What 'tools' is it you're saying are not fixed? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
