Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:04:55AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>
>> You clearly want to be able to push whatever, whenever (see massive KDE
>> updates in supposedly "stable" releases). Others have shown that
>> playing fast and loose with updates has consequences, and putting a
>> little delay in there would probably be better.
>>
>> EPEL has run this way for a while, and it doesn't seem to be a problem.
Uh, no, I did not say that, you snipped the stuff I actually said without
removing the line claiming I said what follows.
> As a datapoint, Fedora Infrastructure runs with EPEL testing enabled. So
> the slow rate of package migration from testing to stable in EPEL can't be
> characterized as "doesn't seem to be a problem". Whether it's a better or
> worse problem to have, I'm not yet opinioned enough to bikeshed about.
To me it shows that that system doesn't work at all.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
