On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:04:55AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > You clearly want to be able to push whatever, whenever (see massive KDE > updates in supposedly "stable" releases). Others have shown that > playing fast and loose with updates has consequences, and putting a > little delay in there would probably be better. > > EPEL has run this way for a while, and it doesn't seem to be a problem. > As a datapoint, Fedora Infrastructure runs with EPEL testing enabled. So the slow rate of package migration from testing to stable in EPEL can't be characterized as "doesn't seem to be a problem". Whether it's a better or worse problem to have, I'm not yet opinioned enough to bikeshed about. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpcwxBcDUJ4b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
