Adam Williamson wrote:
> The good is not the enemy of the perfect. A 90% chance of noticing a
> problem is still better than a 10% chance, even if it's not 100%.
That doesn't help when this takes a week and you break a dozen machines
while waiting for the "don't destroy hardware!" fix (and that's just if the
hardware is really infrequent; you could end up with a lot more broken
machines in a week even with frequencies which may still elude testing).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
