On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:49 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > Imho it is more a perversion of how it is meant to be. This package was > tested before it went to updates-testing and therefore went straight to > stable. But the majority of packages goes to updates-testing and is not > tested by someone else but the maintainer/does not get any karma, but > still is pushed to stable after some time. That's not necessarily a problem in the process. If the package sits in updates-testing for a while and gets no negative feedback, it's a reasonably strong indication it doesn't break anything egregiously, because if it did, someone would come and file negative feedback. it may not be a cast-iron guarantee that the package works perfectly, but it's better than a kick in the head. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
