On 02/15/2010 09:12 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:25:03 +0100, > Roberto Ragusa <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The obvious way to call something which is not 13, but is something >> a little less than 13 is 12.9, but I agree with you that it would be better >> to have 13 in the name instead of 12, so, logically: >> >> 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 13.-2, 13.-1, 13.0, 13.1, ... > > I belive eventually rpm will allow ~ for prerelease stuff, but for now > the convention is to do -0 releases. For example 13-0.1.alpha, 13-0.2.beta, > 13-0.3.rc1. > (Currently fedora-release is version fedora-release-13-0.3 .) I too prefer having the final release version in the name ... it is more clear to humans (12.9 < 13 notwithstanding!) These are good suggestions .. thank you! gene -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
