Adam Williamson said the following on 02/14/2010 12:00 AM Pacific Time: > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't >>> really need to have its own name that's always the same... >> >> Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in "13" before 13 >> is released, and when we're trying to express how things work in the as >> of yet unreleased tree that is fedora 13, it gets pretty wordy. > > I guess I just don't quite see that. Why's it awkward? I don't see the awkwardness either. I see it adding simplicity which is what we need vs. another name we have to explain to people less involved in the development/release process: what it is, if they should use it, etc. Here is a draft diagram I have explaining what the trees and repos look like. I don't think we need an additional label or name as the picture illustrates or see what we gain. http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/paste-bin/nfr-diagram-v2.pdf John -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
